SHIV RAJ SINGH Vs. ROHIT ROADLINES

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE only ground on which this civil misc. appeal is sought to be agitated by the counsel for the appellants claimants (hereinafter 'the claimants') is that the age of the deceased Jai Singh has been taken at 30 years while computing compensation payable under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter 'the Act of 1923') even though as per the post mortem report which was exhibited before the Commissioner the age of the deceased was indicated at 20 years. He submitted that consequently a wrong "relevant factor" has been applied under estimating the compensation to which the claimants were otherwise entitled.

(2.) HEARD . Considered.

(3.) THE misc. appeal is without any force and stands dismissed.