HADMAN Vs. MEGHA RAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS second appeal is directed against judgment and decree dt. 25.03.2004 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Merta as upheld by judgment and decree dt. 30.05.2011 passed by District Judge, Merta, whereby, the suit filed by the plaintiff -appellant for declaration and permanent injunction has been rejected and the appeal thereof has been dismissed respectively. The appellant Hadman while claiming 1/3rd right in the suit property filed a suit seeking declaration and permanent injunction, which was resisted by the defendants.

(2.) AFTER the evidence was led by the parties, the trial Court came to the conclusion that the plaintiff had 1/4th share only in the suit property and, consequently, dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff.

(3.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the judgments passed by both the Courts below.