K.L. MEENA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) INSTANT petition is directed against order of the Central Administrative Tribunal ("Tribunal") dt. 09.08.2000 disposing of original application filed by respondent -4 Deepak Sardana with a direction to consider his case for regularization on the post of LDC after due evaluation of his confidential reports for the past five years with consequential benefits.

(2.) AT the outset it may be noticed that in compliance of order of the Tribunal the respondent was regularized in the cadre of LDC in the year 2002 obviously after evaluation of his confidential reports & other service record and thereafter was promoted as UDC and on the post of Assistant and as informed to this Court that he stood retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.07.2013. Placing reliance upon order of the Tribunal in the case of the present respondent dt. 09.08.2000 Ramavtar who too was similarly situated preferred Original Application No. 325/2000 and that also came to be decided in the same terms vide order dt. 02.02.2001.

(3.) IT was contended by the respondent before the Tribunal that some of the employees who were similarly situated namely Lal Chand Jonewal, Raj Kumar & V.K. Mathur & working since 1976 prior to him they too have been regularized after sufficient long satisfactory service rendered by them w.e.f. 03.11.1980 and he too being similarly situated also rendered sufficient long service at least may be considered for regularization which may protect his service conditions.