SHIV CHARAN Vs. RSRTC

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the notices seeking to terminate their services during probation period from the post of Conductors from respondent RSRTC vide Annex.6 dated 30/9/2013.

(2.) THE petitioners were appointed in the selection process undertaken in pursuance of Advertisement dated 23/3/2012, in which on account of revision of merit list, upon change of answer key on the basis of expert opinion, it is stated that 56 new persons came in the revised merit list above the present petitioners and the petitioners were pushed down in merit list and on account of such revision of marks/merit, the impugned termination notices were served upon them after they had already served for 3 -4 months on probation, to make way for the new appointees, who found place in merit list upon revision of the merit list and those persons had already been also offered appointment vide order dated 20/9/2013.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the respondent ­ RSRTC, Mr. Harish Purohit submitted that the present writ petitions also deserve to be disposed of in same terms. He also drew the attention of the Court towards the order passed by this Court in the case of Sandeep Kumar Babal vs. Sate of Rajasthan & ors. - SBCWP No. 1460/2013 decided on 14/5/2014 in which relying upon the order of Division Bench in the case of Vinita Sharma & ors. Vs State of Rajasthan & ors. - DB Civil Special Appeal (W) No. 207/2013 decided on 2/8/2013, this Court dismissed the writ petition.