STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. SHIV LAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE criminal leave to appeal as well as the appeal have been preferred respectively on behalf of State and complainant -Badam Bai against the judgment dated 05.03.2014 passed by Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Chittorgarh Camp at Begun (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) in Sessions Case No. 26/2012, whereby the trial court has acquitted the accused -Shiv Lal for the offences punishable under sections 341, 354 and 376 IPC.

(2.) LEARNED Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of appellant -Badam Bai have argued that sufficient evidence is available on record against the accused -Shiv Lal to prove that he has committed offences punishable under sections 351, 354 and 376 IPC, however, the learned trial court, without appreciating the evidence as well as the material available on record, has illegally acquitted the accused -Shiv Lal for the alleged offences.

(3.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.