MOHANI BAI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner, in the instant writ application, has prayed for the following relief(s):

(2.) Shorn off unnecessary details, the indispensable skeletal material facts, necessary for appreciation of the controversy raised needs to be first noticed. It is pleaded case of the petitioner that she was appointed as Cook on 11th January, 1994 on a monthly salary of 600/-. The State-respondents framed a scheme for regularisation of part time Chowkidars/Cooks and submitted the same before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court taking note of the Scheme appended as Annexure- A to the list of dates, which were taken on record, observed that the Scheme was just and reasonable and disposed of the petitions substituting the High Court orders by an order directing regularisation as per Scheme. The Scheme submitted by the State-respondents contemplated for a District-wise Screening Committee for the purpose of phase-wise regularisation. The Constitution of the Committee reads thus:

(3.) Jobs and duties of the Screening Committee have specifically been spelled out in the Draft Action Plan/Scheme for regularisation. Since the case of the petitioner was considered for regularisation she has instituted the present writ proceedings.