RAM KRIPAL GUPTA Vs. RENT TRIBUNAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) It is stated that writ petition contains incorrect and false facts thus contempt proceedings may be initiated under Article 215 of the Constitution of India. It is moreso when act of the petitioner is deliberate. He has even used language for the court below not befitting to its status. The way petitioner approached this court shows his conduct. Even before the executing court, incorrect facts were mentioned regarding date of writ petition before this court. Reply to the application has been submitted by them. I do not find it to be satisfactory. At this stage unconditional apology has been tendered and is accepted with the warning to the petitioner not to repeat it otherwise serious view would be taken. Every party is expected to approach this court with clean hands and use the language befitting to the status of the court below. Application moved by the respondent accordingly stands disposed of with acceptance of unconditional apology with the warning as given above.

(2.) Learned counsel for petitioner, under instructions, does not press the writ petition if reasonable time is granted to vacate the premises. As agreed, six months' time is granted to vacate the premises from today. With the aforesaid, writ petition so as stay application are disposed of without causing interference in the impugned order challenged herein with the following directions: