JAMEEL KHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY this writ petition, a challenge is made to the order dated 3.12.2012 and 13.3.2013, whereby, petitioner's services were dispensed with.

(2.) LEARNED counsel submits that earlier also an order of termination was passed, however, on challenge, labour court passed an award in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner was taken in service but again his services have been terminated in violation of the provisions of section 25 -F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

(3.) THE other ground is regarding arbitrary action of the respondents. The petitioner was not paid due amount pursuant to the earlier award of the labour court and even after attaining the finality of the award upto the Division Bench of this court, hence, when petitioner prayed for it, the respondents took revengeful action. Accordingly, impugned orders deserve to be set aside.