UDA Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN D.B. Cr. Appeal No. 391/2006 accused -appellant Uda and in D.B. Cr. Appeal No. 446/2006 accused -appellants Ratan Lal and Heera have challenged the veracity of judgment dated 22.3.2006 passed in Sessions Case No. 128/2005 by which the Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 1, Udaipur had convicted and sentenced all the three accused -appellants as follows:

(2.) SINCE both the appeals are against one and the same judgment, so they are being decided here by a common judgment.

(3.) ON the other hand, it has been argued by the learned Public Prosecutor that there is no infirmity in the judgment of the trial court and the prosecution case is well proved against all the accused -appellants. It has also been argued that minor discrepancies and minor contradictions, if any found in the statements of the prosecution witnesses should be ignored to do the substantive justice in the matter.