MAHAVEER PRASAD KUMHAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE instant batch of the writ application raises a common question of law and facts, and therefore, is being taken up for adjudication by this common order.

(2.) WHEN the matter came up on 27th May, 2014, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. However, in order to grant yet another opportunity of hearing to the learned counsel for the petitioners/petitioners, the matter was posted to 30th May, 2014, with an order to the effect that if none appears on the next date, the matter will be dealt with according to law, including proceedings ex -parte. Today i.e., on 30th May, 2014, neither the learned counsel for the petitioners nor any of the petitioners, is present in the Court to pursue the matter. No request for adjournment has been made either.

(3.) THIS Court while issuing notices to the state -respondents on 17th February, 2006, took note of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners claiming their entitlement for regular pay scale, from the date of their initial appointment or at least for notional fixation, placing reliance on the opinion of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Prashant Vohra & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.:, 2005(1) WLC (Raj.) 264/