ANWAR HUSSAIN Vs. RAJASTHAN BOARD OF MUSLIM WAQF

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PETITIONER , Secretary of the Wakf Committee of Gram Dantala, Tehsil Siwana, District Barmer, has preferred this writ petition praying under -mentioned reliefs:

(2.) AT the threshold, notices were issued to the respondent. On 28.5.2014, counsel for the Wakf Board appeared and sought time to file reply. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a request to grant interim protection and therefore while deferring the matter for 7th July 2014, the impugned order dated 4th of March 2014 was kept in abeyance. The said order was further extended on 7th of July 2014 and it remained operative till 18th July 2014.

(3.) PER contra, learned counsel for respondent Wakf Board has submitted that the order, whereby the Committee was appointed, clearly envisage that Board has reserved its right to supercede or substitute the Wakf Committee before expiry of the tenure and as such the contention of the learned counsel is not tenable. The learned counsel for the respondents further submits that in the new committee petitioner is retained as Joint Secretary and therefore at his behest this writ petition is not tenable as he is not an aggrieved person.