BHAGU RAM Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the orders dt. 28.2.2011 and 23.4.2012 passed by the Board of Revenue, whereby the revision filed by the respondent No. 2 Roopa Ram has been accepted and the review petition filed by the petitioner has been rejected respectively. The respondent No. 3 Smt. Dallu filed a suit for partition, declaration of khatedari, correction of record and permanent injunction against the respondents No. 4 to 20 and the petitioner. During the pendency of the suit Roopa Ram claiming himself to be adopted son of Smt. Dallu and her husband Gumana Ram filed an application under Order I, Rule 10 C.P.C. seeking impleadment as party -plaintiff in the suit.

(2.) THE Sub -Divisional Officer, Deedwana by his order dt. 19.4.2004 rejected the application filed by Roopa Ram on noticing that as the evidence of plaintiff is already over and if Roopa Ram wanted any relief being adopted son of Gumana Ram, he can seek such relief from his mother and the application was highly belated.

(3.) THE review petition filed by the petitioner regarding the order dt. 28.2.2011 was rejected by the Board of Revenue.