VIPUL SULZ FAB PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. RIICO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THIS appeal is directed against the order dated 28.09.2013 passed by Additional District Judge No.2, Bhilwara, whereby, the application filed by the appellants under Section 9 of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been rejected on an application filed by the respondents under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC.

(3.) WHEREAFTER , the present application under Section 9 of the Act was filed by the appellants seeking 'interim measure' regarding the subject matter of the arbitration agreement. The respondents filed an application under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC alleging that the earlier suit, which was filed by the parties was based on the similar allegations and was rejected by the court and, therefore, the present proceedings under Section