LRS OF HARI SINGH Vs. MAHENDRA RAJ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. These review petitions are directed against the judgment dated 13.02.2012 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, whereby, the appeals therein were dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 29.05.2003 passed by the trial court was affirmed.

(2.) THE review petition, which runs into about 23 pages contains as many as 14 grounds seeking to question the judgment passed by this Court. The principal submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that while passing the impugned judgment, this Court did not consider the effect of document (Ex.A/1) regarding which the empathetic arguments were advanced before this Court, which has resulted into passing of the impugned judgment and according to the learned counsel the same suffers from error apparent on the face of record, which needs to be rectified by this Court.

(3.) I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the impugned judgment as well as the review petition. This Court in the impugned judgment dated 13.02.2012 at page - 10 -11 of the judgment observed as under: -