BAKTA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner in the present writ petitions has sought following relief/s: -

(2.) THE learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Nakhtu Ram V/s State of Rajasthan and ors. - SBCWP No.660/2011 decided on 15.1.2014, in which this Court held as under:

(3.) MR . H.S. Sidhu, learned counsel for the petitioners, has urged that the controversy involved in the present writ petitions, is squarely covered by a decision of a coordinate bench of this Court in the case of Smt. Bheera Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Anr. (SBCWP No.3746/2006 decided on 06.10.2006) in which, against the same respondent - Forest Department for similarly situated employee (Beldar), who was appointed on 01.04.1985 under the similar circumstances, when the Medical Board sought to determine the age of the employee, this Court quashed the said office order prematurely retiring the petitioner/incumbent and allowed the writ petition with cost of Rs.5,000/ - against the Forest Department.