REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Lallulal Appellant

V/S

PRAKASH CHAND Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

CIT VS. RAM RAKSHPAL ASHOK KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
PUKH RAJ MEHTA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN SINGH VS. CHAMAN PASWAN [REFERRED TO]
JANAKI PANDYANI VS. GANESHWAR PANDA (DEAD) BY LRS [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN SINGH VS. CHAMAN PASWAN [REFERRED TO]
MALLESAPPA BANDEPPA DESAI VS. DESAI MALLAPPA ALIAS MALLESAPPA [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. GHAMANDI RAM DEAD [REFERRED TO]
RATNAM CHETTIAR VS. S M KUPPUSWAMI CHETTIAR [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX KANPUR VS. CHANDER SEN [REFERRED TO]
YUDHISHTER VS. ASHOK KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
BHARATHAN VS. K SUDHAKARAN [REFERRED TO]
M L SUBBARAYA SETTY DEAD VS. M L NAGAPPA SETTY DEAD [REFERRED TO]
COMMON CAUSE VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
DEVA SAHAYAM VS. P SAVITHRAMMA [REFERRED TO]
SHEELA DEVI VS. LAL CHAND [REFERRED TO]
KAMAKSHI BUILDERS VS. AMBEDKAR EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY [REFERRED TO]
BHANWAR SINGH VS. PURAN [REFERRED TO]
BACHHAJ NAHAR VS. NILIMA MANDAL [REFERRED TO]
AZHAR SULTANA VS. B RAJAMANI [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. IBRAHIM UDDIN [REFERRED TO]
HARDAYAL SINGH VS. CAPT K V BATRA [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX ANDHRA PRADESH VS. MUKUNDGIRJI [REFERRED TO]
SHRIVALLABHDAS MODANI VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [REFERRED TO]
KIRPAL SINGH VS. MST KARTARO [REFERRED TO]
HANUMAN VS. HARI RAM [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE instant appeal witnesses a challenge to the judgment and order dated 1.7.1991, rendered by the learned Single Judge of this court in S.B.Civil First Appeal No.12/1982, preferred by the plaintiff - respondents herein, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 23.9.1981 of the learned District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur, dismissing their suit for partition i.e. Civil Suit No.257/1979. By the decision impugned herein, the suit has been decreed.

(2.) WE have heard Mr.Mr.Ajeet Bhandari, learned Sr.Counsel, assisted by Mr.Vaibhav Bhargava, appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr.S.M.Mehta learned Sr.Counsel assisted by Mr.D.S.Poonia, Mr.R.K.Agarwal learned Sr.Counsel, assisted by Mr.Yogesh Pujari & Mr.Alok Chaturvedi and Mr.Vimal Choudhary, learned counsel for the respective respondents.

(3.) MR .Bhandari, learned Senior Counsel for the appelalnt submits that he has instructions to represent the heirs and Legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.6 and, thus, they may be substituted in her place.

Click here to view full judgment.

LALLULAL Vs. PRAKASH CHAND

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address