LAWS(RAJ)-2014-10-66

RAMSWAROOP Vs. PRABHU

Decided On October 31, 2014
RAMSWAROOP Appellant
V/S
PRABHU Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 23/7/2001 passed by the Additional District Judge, Gangapurcity (Rajasthan) [hereinafter referred to as 'the Appellate Court'] in Regular Appeal No. 35 of 1999, whereby the Appellate Court has set aside the judgment and decree dated 31/8/1999 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bamanwas (hereinafter referred to as 'the Trial Court') in the Civil Suit No. 96 of 1992.

(2.) THE appellant/plaintiff had filed the suit, seeking declaration to the effect that the patta issued by the Gram Panchayat in favour of the respondent/defendant on 12/8/1989 be declared as null and void and seeking permanent injunction for restraining the respondents/defendants from putting up any obstruction to the plaintiff's use and occupation of the land in question. The said suit was resisted by the respondents/defendants, denying the allegations made in the plaint and contending inter -alia that the patta was issued by the Gram Panchayat legally to the defendants. The Trial Court, from the pleadings of the parties, had framed five issues, and after appreciating the evidence on record had decreed the suit by setting aside the patta - Ex. A1 issued by the Gram Panchayat, Raiwali in favour of the respondents/defendants, and also by granting the permanent injunction, as prayed for. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the respondents/defendants had preferred the appeal before the Appellate Court, which appeal came to be allowed vide the impugned judgment and decree. Being aggrieved by the same, the appellants/plaintiffs had filed the present appeal.

(3.) SO far as the substantial question of law is concerned, it is needless to say that as per the provisions contained in Order XLI, Rule 31 of CPC, the judgment of the Appellate Court must contain the points for determination, the decision thereon, the reasons for the decision, and where the decree appealed form is reversed or varied, the relief to which the appellant is entitled. Thus, though the appellate court could decide more than one points for determination or the issues as the case may be jointly, nonetheless, the appellate court is duty bound to give specific decision for such points or issues. A beneficial reference of the decision in case of H. Siddiqui (Dead) By LRs Vs. A. Ramalingam : (2011) 4 SCC 240 be made in this regard, in which it has been held as under: -