TARA CHAND Vs. JAI PRAKASH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AFTER attempting to make submissions for sometime on the appeal, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant may be granted extra time for vacating the suit premises.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties regarding grant of extra time to vacate the suit premises. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is running the Chemist Shop in the suit premises since 1977 and he may be granted time till 31st March, 2016 for vacating the suit premises. Learned counsel for the respondent opposed the prayer for grant of time. It was submitted that the suit was filed in the year 1996; a meager sum of Rs.451/ - per month is being paid as rent and the same also is in arrears and, therefore, the appellant is not entitled for grant of extra time. If any extra time is granted, the appellant should be made to pay reasonable mesne profit.

(3.) IN view of the above, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks withdrawal of the appeal and the same is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. The stay application is also dismissed. However, the appellant is granted time to vacate the suit premises by 31st March, 2016 on the following conditions: -