(1.) WITH the consent of the parties, writ petition is heard finally. A challenge has been made to the order Dt. 07.07.2010 whereby application for amendment in the written statement was rejected on the ground that there exist no provision for the aforesaid purpose.
(2.) LEARNED counsel for respondents submits that rejection of the application should have been on the ground that events have not taken place subsequent to the filing of the written statement. The facts were available with the petitioner while filing the written statement itself.