VIJAY SINGH Vs. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) MATTER has come up on the early hearing application, however, with the consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard at this stage. The petitioner was initially appointed on the post of ASI (M) in April, 1994 and while in service there were adverse remarks recorded in his ACR and for some alleged delinquency, a penalty of censure was inflicted upon him under the Disciplinary Rules which was the subject matter of challenge before the ld. Tribunal and at present are pending before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir.

(2.) HOWEVER , based on the service record, when the candidature of petitioner was considered for Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP), he was not recommended by the committee obviously on the basis of his adverse record of service and it was communicated to him vide order dt. 12.06.2007 (Ann. 1). The said communication was challenged by the petitioner by filing Original Application before the ld. Tribunal.

(3.) COUNSEL further submits that even if the petitioner was not recommended on the basis of adverse record of service for grant of ACP, which became due to him, vide order dt. 12.06.2007 but he could not be deprived from fair consideration for indefinite period and the respondents are under obligation to consider his candidature for grant of ACP, keeping in view adverse record of service, at least for subsequent years and if he finally succeeds before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir that will give him a right of review and to reconsider on the basis of change in the record of service which at one stage denied to him vide order dt. 12.06.2007.