LAWS(RAJ)-2014-4-14

MAHESH KUMAR Vs. SATYAPRAKASH

Decided On April 12, 2014
MAHESH KUMAR Appellant
V/S
SATYAPRAKASH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 19.10.2013 passed by the Additional District Judge No.2, Bikaner, whereby the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bikaner has been upheld.

(2.) The facts in brief may be noticed thus: a suit seeking eviction was filed by the plaintiff-respondent Satyaprakash against Shiv Ratan father of the present appellants in 1986 alongwith him appellant No.5 Ram Kumar was impleaded as defendant No.2 and one Gherulal was impleaded as defendant No.3. The suit was filed alleging default in payment of rent, nonuser of the suit premises, material alteration, nuisance, subletting, change of user and denial of title.

(3.) A written statement was filed by Shiv Ratan disputing the averments made in the plaint.