(1.) FATHER of petitioner was one of the workmen whose services were retrenched by respondents on 30.05.1983. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with prayer that retrenchment of his father from the services by the respondents be declared illegal and he be held entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service with effect from 30.05.1983, the date of his retrenchment. During the course of arguments, it is contended that the reference made in respect of retrenchment of services of the father of the petitioner is still pending in group of cases.
(2.) THE prayer aforesaid therefore cannot be considered in the writ petition as it has to be ultimately decided by the Labour Court.
(3.) WRIT petition is accordingly dismissed.