GOVIND SINGH RAJPUROHIT Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE lawyers are observing strike which is contrary to various Supreme Court decisions. Name of Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, as counsel for the petitioners is shown in the cause list.

(2.) THE case is listed at Serial No. 11 in today's cause list in the category of "Admission with notice served -reply filed".

(3.) THE petitioner is working on the post of Enforcement Inspector. He was initially appointed as Industry Extension Officer vide order dated 26.10.1981 and he joined the duties on 09.11.1981. The petitioner was declared surplus vide order dated 08.03.1988 and he jointed his duties on 15.11.1989 on the post of Enforcement Inspector. The petitioner has averred that the post of Industry Extension Officer and the post of Enforcement Inspector were equivalent posts having the same pay scales and qualification.