LAWS(RAJ)-2014-12-317

RATA GAMETI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Decided On December 18, 2014
Rata Gameti Appellant
V/S
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The instant criminal revision petition has been filed by the convict Rata Gameti S/o Nathu Gameti, resident of village Taramela (Padrada),District Udaipur against the judgment dated 18.6.2014 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge NO.4, Udaipur in Cr. Appeal No.70/2013 (174/11) whereby the learned Sessions Judge No.4, Udaipur partly allowed the appeal of the petitioner and modified the judgment dated 13.6.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gogunda, District Udaipur in Cr. Case No.527/2005 whereby the accused petitioner was convicted for the charge under Section 323/34 IPC but confirmed the finding and punishment of the learned trial court for offence under Section 394 IPC and punishment of 3 years RI with fine of L 1000/-

(2.) At the threshold the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging the finding of conviction for offence under Section 395 IPC, however, it is submitted that FIR was registered on 12.12.2005 at Police Station Sayara in which an allegation was leveled by the complainant Pema to the effect that on 11.11.2005 when he was going to Karwad Forest for collecting Chana at that time, two persons came there and started beatings with him and snatched his gold earrings and L 10/- and ran way from there. In the FIR it is stated that both the persons were present accused Rata and Bhoma who belongs to his own village. During the pendency of appeal, Bhoma died, therefore, appeal of Bhoma was ordered to be abated vide order dated 9.5.2014 and in appeal filed by the petitioner he was acquitted from the charge under Section 323/34 but conviction for offence under Section 394 IPC was maintained.

(3.) As per the learned counsel for the petitioner in the medical report there are only 4 simple injuries out of which one is burse and 3 are abrasions and there is no specific allegation for inflicting those injuries by the petitioner and petitioner is facing criminal proceedings since 2005, therefore, the sentence awarded to the petitioner may be reduced from 3 years to already undergone.