LALOO Vs. AVVNL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the following prayers:

(2.) THE learned counsel for the respondents, Mr. Vikram Choudhary submitted that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is covered by the decision of this Court of in the case of Dinesh Chandra V/s Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. -SBCWP No. 2540/2013 decided on 5.5.2014 in which this court held as under:

(3.) IN these circumstances, since such questions of facts cannot be gone into straightway under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the writ jurisdiction, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty and direction to the petitioner to move appropriate representation to the respondent No. 1 -Managing Director, Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., who will pass appropriate speaking order preferably after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Such representation may be filed within a period of two weeks from today and the representation is expected to be decided within a period of three months as an outer limit for the said respondent by a speaking order. No order as to costs. A copy of this order be sent to the parties concerned forthwith.