SALEEM KHAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WITH the consent of the learned counsel for the parties the writ petition was taken up for final adjudication at this stage.

(2.) AGGRIEVED of the non -compliance of the directions issued by this Court vide judgment and order dated 28th January, 1993, to reinstate the petitioner in service and accord other benefits as directed therein; the petitioner has instituted these writ proceedings.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the petitioner reiterating the pleaded facts, submitted that the petitioner could not gather the information about the judgment and order dated 28th January, 1993, since he was not in the town. He learned about the judgment and order dated 28th January, 1993, only when he saw other similarly situated candidates in service and on an enquiry from them, the fact of the judgment and order dated 28th January, 1993, could be ascertained and therefore, represented to the respondents to reinstate him and accord all the benefits as ordered vide judgment and order dated 28th January, 1993. Having received no response, a notice for demand of justice was addressed through his Counsel. It is pleaded case of the petitioner that the respondents have reinstated identically situated candidates ignoring him and therefore, the action has been assailed as discriminatory. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner could not contact his counsel at the relevant time on account of some family problems and has finally instituted the writ proceedings for compliance of the judgment and order dated 28th January, 1993.