SAEED SHAH AND ORS. Vs. IRFAAN AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this matter Sections 6, 7 and 85 of the Wak Fact, 1995 (for short "the Act of 1995") are relevant because these provisions have been relied upon by both the parties in the case. For proper appreciation of the evidence of the parties, these three sections are quoted below: - -

(2.) IN the case in hand, petitioners -defendants have challenged the order dated 3.12.2013 which was passed by Addl. Civil Judge(JD) No. 1, Jaipur Metro, Jaipur in Civil Suit No. 10/2013 titled as Irfaan v. Saeed Shah and others whereby application of the petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC was dismissed by this Court.

(3.) I have heard the arguments of both the parties. I have perused the impugned order and I have also perused the other documents relied upon by the parties. The petitioners have relied upon the following rulings: - -