RAJENDRA GUPTA Vs. RUKMANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE writ petition has been filed by the petitioner -plaintiff challenging the order dt. 19.2.14 passed by the Addl. District & Sessions Judge No. 18, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial court') whereby the trial Court has reserved the order on the issue of (sic) exhibits on the documents produced by the petitioner -plaintiff till the final hearing of the suit. After having heard the learned counsel Mr. Saransh Saini for the petitioner and to the impugned order, it appears that the trial Court has reserved the order on marking of the exhibits on the documents alongwith final hearing of the suit, which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner is fixed on 21.4.14. The only apprehension expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that unless the documents in question are tentatively marked, the petitioner -plaintiff would not be able to refer the same during the course of arguments. He has also relief upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal vs. State of Gujarat, : RLW 2001(1) SC 169 in which it has been held in para 14 as under: -

(2.) SINCE the suit is already at the stage of final hearing, no further order is passed in the instant petition except to observe that the trial Court shall follow the aforestated observations made by the Apex Court for marking the documents. With this observation the present petition is dismissed.