ROSHNI DEVI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has preferred this writ petition for assailing the impugned notice dated 22nd of January 2014 (Annex.9) issued by the second respondent and has further prayed for restraining the respondents from taking any coercive action against him pursuant to the said notice. Alternatively, the petitioner has also prayed that the respondents may be directed to regularize the alleged excess land in excess on which he is in possession.

(2.) DURING the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Purohit, has confined his prayer only to the extent that the reply to the impugned notice submitted by the petitioner before the Commissioner, Municipal Council, Sri Ganganagar be considered appropriately by the authority and a direction to this effect be issued to the Commissioner, Municipal Council, Sri Gangangar.

(3.) WITHOUT expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner and the grievances ventilated by the petitioner in his reply to the impugned notice, I deem it just and proper to dispose of the writ petition with direction to the Commissioner, Municipal Council, Sri Ganganagar to take a decision on the reply to notice submitted by the petitioner objectively strictly in accordance with law within a period of 30 days from the date of production of this order. Till final decision on this reply/explanation furnished by the petitioner, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.