YASHPAL DANGI Vs. STATE OF RAJ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for direction to the respondents to modify Clause -11 of the notification dated 25.3.2013 (Annex.4) to the effect that the petitioner is entitled to get 20% weightage in place of 10% weightage.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that in pursuance of the advertisement dated 25.3.2013, an application was filed by the petitioner for appointment on the post of Account Assistant. In the advertisement, bonus marks are provided for the services rendered by the candidates in various schemes of the Government. As per petitioner, he worked as Accounts Assistant in the Mahatma Gandhi Narega Project and a certificate was also issued in his favour on 19.3.2013 whereby it was certified that the petitioner worked for one year eight months and two days but in the advertisement, 10 bonus marks is provided for one year experience and 20 bonus marks for two years service and the petitioner worked for more than one and half year, therefore, in view of the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Bhudev Sharma Vs. District Judge, Bulandshahar and Anr., the respondents are under obligation to give benefit of bonus marks after rounding up the year upto two years because he worked for one year eight months and two days, therefore, direction may be issued to the respondents to modify Clause -II of the notification dated 25.3.2013 (Annex.4) and grant 20 bonus marks for the service period of one year eight months and two days.

(3.) IN view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents that in the event of filing any representation by the petitioner for his grievance, the said representation may be decided strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. However, it is made it clear that for the benefits of bonus marks, the respondents shall comply the directions given by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above pending case.