SUGAN LAL Vs. KAMLA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS restoration application has been filed for recalling the order dt. 19.07.2011 whereby the appeal was dismissed as peremptory order of the Court could not be complied with. The contention of the present applicants is that the defects were formal in nature and on restoration of appeal, the defects would be removed, hence the appeal be restored. The further contention of the present applicants is that he was not having knowledge of the peremptory order, hence defects could not be removed.

(2.) HEARD the learned counsels for the parties and perused the order of dismissal. Admittedly, the order dt. 21.04.2011 has been passed in presence of appellants' Advocate, hence the contention of the appellants is wrong on the face of it that they were not knowing about the impugned order and in pursuance of order dt. 21.04.2011, the appeal has been dismissed on 19.07.2011 and after a considerable delay of 600 days, the restoration application has been filed without any cause, much less reasonable cause.