RESIDENT ENGINEER Vs. MOHAN LAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HAVING regard to the submissions made in the application (CMCW No. 107/2014), 2 days' delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

(2.) WE have heard the learned counsel for the appellant on admission. After having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and having perused the material placed on record, we are unable to find even a wee bit of reason to consider interference in this appeal.

(3.) 02.1993. By way of the award, the Labour Court concerned declared the termination of services of the workman illegal and directed for his reinstatement with continuity of services and for according him other benefits as accorded to other similarly circumstanced persons. The writ petition and then special appeal filed in this Court against the award so made were dismissed respectively on 11.01.1994 and 18.02.1994. The workman, thereafter, moved an application under Section 33C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'the Act') and during pendency thereof, he also approached the State Government for interpretation of the relief granted to him under the award dated 04.02.1993, whereupon the question was referred by the State Government for adjudication to the Labour Court, Sriganganagar under Section 36A(1) of the Act by the Notification dated 27.08.1998 in the following terms: -