RAGHUNATH RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJ

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for direction to the respondents to modify Clause -11 of the notification dated 25.3.2013 (Annex.4) to the effect that the petitioner is entitled to get 20% weightage in place of 10% weightage.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that in pursuance of the advertisement dated 25.3.2013, an application was filed by the petitioner for appointment on the post of Account Assistant. In the advertisement, bonus marks are provided for the services rendered by the candidates in various schemes of the Government.

(3.) AFTER hearing learned counsel for the parties, it emerges from the facts that the controversy with regard to grant of bonus marks is pending before Hon'ble Supreme Court and Coordinate Bench of this Court in identical controversy passed an order on 07.11.2013 in SB Civil Writ Petition No.4144/2013 (Archana Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. that for the grievance of experience the petitioner may file representation before the respondents and respondents are directed to decide the representation strictly in accordance with law. It is also made clear in the order that after the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP bearing No.32008 -32009/2013 (State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Archana), if Hon'ble Supreme Court decides that bonus marks are permissible then the petitioner will be entitled to get benefits of bonus marks strictly in accordance with law. The operative part of the order dated 07.11.2013 passed in SB Civil Writ Petition No.4144/2013 by Coordinate Bench of this Court is as follows : -