GYARSI Vs. RAMKARAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner wife filed an application under Section 125 Cr. P. C. before the Trial Court on 20. 11. 1997. While allowing maintenance to minor son Rs. 350/- per month, the Trial Court rejected the claim of the petitioner vide order dated 29. 7. 2000 mainly on the ground that the petitioner wife is not living with the respondent husband without any sufficient reasons. Revision filed by the petitioner against the order of the Trial Court was also dismissed by the revisional court vide order dated 5. 12. 2000. Hence the present petition challenging both the orders passed by the courts below denying maintenance to the petitioner wife under Section 125 Cr. P. C.

(2.) AFTER hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have carefully gone through the material on record as also both the orders passed by the courts below.