LILA RAM Vs. NANDU BAI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD.

(2.) THERE principal question have been raised by the learned counsel for the appellant in this second appeal.

(3.) ANOTHER question raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is regarding fixation of the standard rent. Learned counsel for the appeal submits that in 1968 the rent was Rs. 56/- per months and in 2001, the court had fixed Rs. 750/- as rent for one shop whereas, both the shops were rented on Rs. 56/- per month. If the price escalation is considered, then in 1968, the prices of commodities and the prices of commodities today, having been taken note of by the courts below and a sum of Rs. 750/- having been fixed for one shop, this court feels that this does not make out a case for interference in second appeal. When two courts concurrently held Rs. 750/- as a reasonable sum, then no substantial question of law is considered to emerge out from the facts of this case which requires interference in the second appeal.