SHALINI SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SINCE all these writ petitions relate to Advertisement dated October 1, 2001 notified by Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for short `rpsc') for the direct recruitment to the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector, they are taken up together for the disposal.

(2.) CONTEXTUAL facts depict that as many as 71 vacancies for male and 31 for female were advertised by the RPSC on October 1, 2001 for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector. Pursuant to the advertisement all the petitioners submitted applications and were allowed to appear in the written examination that was qualified by all the petitioners. The candidature of the petitioner was rejected by the RPSC on the ground that on the last date of submission of application form i. e. November 19, 2001 the petitioners did not posses eligibility requirement incorporated in the advertisement. This act of respondent RPSC in rejecting the candidature of the petitioners has been assailed in these writ petitions.

(3.) FINDING prima facie case in favour of the petitioners this Court vide interim orders permitted the petitioners to provisionally appear in the interview but the result of the interview was ordered to be kept in sealed cover. Since I find merit in the writ petitions, the RPSC may now be asked to declare the result of interview.