LICHHMAN RAM Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition has been filed with the following prayers : " (a) The respondents may kindly be directed to release the petitioner on permanent parole till the case of the petitioner is considered by the Advisory Board. (b) The respondents may kindly be directed to put the case of the petitioner to the Advisory Board for the consideration under the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentence) Rules, 1958 for releasing the petitioner on permanent parole under the Rules. (c) Any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. (d) Writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs. "

(2.) IN the previous D. B. Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 4302/92, filed by the petitioner, following order was passed on 09. 11. 92 : "this petition has been filed by the petitioner who is undergoing life im-prisonment at Central Jail, Bikaner. He has prayed that his case may be sent to the Advisory Board for consideration under the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentence) Rules, 1958 for releasing him on permanent parole. Reply has been* filed by the State and it has been pointed out that the petitioner has completed 16 years, 2 months and 3 days imprisonment including remissions and his case was referred to the Advisory Board on 10. 04. 1992 at Central Jail Bikaner but the Advisory Board did not consider it a fit case for permanent release of the petitioner. Mr. Jasmatia, learned Govt. Advocate submits that the next meeting of the Advisosy Board will be held in January, 1993. Let the case of the petitioner be placed before the Advisory Board for sympathetic consideration in accordance with the rules. The habeas corpus petition is disposed of with the above observations. "