AMAR SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision arises out of an order passed by District Judge, Churu as Appellate Officer, under section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 rejecting the petitioners' appeal against the order passed by the Estate Officer on 21. 4. 84 directing the eviction of the petitioner from the disputed public premises under section 5 (1) of the Act of. 1971.

(2.) THE Appellate Officer has held the appeal to be barred by time on the ground that the order under section 5 (1) was made on 21. 4. 84. Under section 9 of the Act appeal has to be filed within 12 days. THE appeal was presented on 2. 1. 88. THE notice of order. . . . . was issued in the name of petitioner was served on him and there was no sufficient cause for the petitioner to have filed the appeal in 1988 long after expiry of period of limitation.

(3.) IT will not be out of place to mention here that law in this connection is well-settled that where a statute provided that an act or thing to be done in a particular manner then that act or thing can be done only in the manner prescribed and not in any other manner.