GHANSHYAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD. Perused the relevant record.

(2.) THIS petition has been filed under Sec. 482 Cr. P. C. against the order of learned A. C. J. M. , Jait|aran dt. 29/5/93 whereby he transmitted a criminal complaint submitted before him by respondent No. 2 Shri Himmat Singh for the offences u/ss. 406, 420-B IPC to the S. H. O. , Jaitaran u/s. 156 (3) Cr. P. C. with the direction to register and investigate the case.

(3.) I have perused the contents of criminal complaint and it cannot be said that the contents mentioned therein do not constitute any cognizable offence. Therefore, this contention has also no force.