GHANSHYAM LAL MATHUR Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE case has a chequred history. The petitioner joined as Lower Division Clerk on 1.4.50 and was working in the Public Works Department. A seniority list dated 29.10.56 was issued to which his name was shown at Serial No. 135. Non -petitioners Chogalal Jain and Shri Dev Mitra were shown below him in the list. The seniority of the petitioner as LDC was maintained in the Gradation List dated 26.9.62 is had under the provisions of State Reorganisation Act, 1956. The petitioner went on deputation in the Education Department and served the said department from 19.1.56 to 18.6.64 but he was repatrinted in June, 1964 to his parent department and was taken back as substantive LDC while his two juniors namely said Shri Chogalal Jain and Shri Dev Mitra had been promoted on higher grade of a UDC with effect from 1.3.56. The petitioner made representations and was eventually promoted as substantive UDC with effect from 29.1.65 and his seniority was place at 31 -A in the seniority list of UDCs. The petitioner was not promoted as Office Assistant or Stock Verifier or Office Superintendent whereupon he filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1696 of 1976 - Ghansayamlal v. State and Ors. An interim order was passed in the said writ petition on 22.2.78 by Hon'ble Shri D.P. Gupta as he then was and the petitioner was asked to inform the Court as to what relief he would be entitled to on the aforesaid basis namely that he may be deemed to have been confirmed as UDC with effect from 1956 and fixed in the pay scale of Upper Division Clerk. The matter was eventually decided by Hon'ble Shri CM. Lodha, as he was then on 30.3.82. This order was modified by another order dated 25.8.82 and the result was that respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Office Assistant with effect from the dates persons junior to the petitioner were prompted Consequently, the case of the petitioner was reconsidered and the petitioner was ordered to be promoted as Office Assistant with effect from 17.9.68 vide order Annexure 6 dated 26.8.87. His pay was also directed to be fixed under Rule 26 -A of the RSR.

(3.) THIS writ petition has been opposed on behalf of the respondents on the principal ground that in the earlier writ petition No. 1696 of 1976, decided by Hon'ble G.M. Lodha, J. on 30.3.82, no relief was granted in favour of the petitioner for his consequential promotions.