POMA RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE twin applications, one under section 482, and the other under section 438 Cr. P. C. are directed against an order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sirohi dated June 27, 1983 passed in Sessions Case No. 31 of 1981 on his file. It was prayed that the aforesaid order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge be quashed and in alternative anticipatory bail be granted to them.

(2.) SINCE the facts and circumstances arising for consideration in these two petitions are closely knitted inter se, they were heard together and are disposed of by a common order.

(3.) IN reply it was vehemently contended that the accused were let off not on bail but under 'habeas Corpus'. It was argued that the accused had strane-ously contended before Mehta, J. , that they should be released on bail instead of being let off but their contention was negatived. The order of Mehta, J. clearly shows that prayer for bail was straight way rejected. I have taken the respective contentions into consideration.