VINOD KUMAR PUROHIT Vs. UNIVERSITY OF JODHPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a petition by Vinod Kumar Purohit under Article. 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:

(2.) THE petitioner sought admission in Three year Degree Course in Law in 1980. The admission, examination, etc. to Three Year Degree Course in Law are governed by Ordinance 353 to 367 of the University. Mr. M.R. Singhvi. learned Counsel for the petitioner has referred to Ordinance 356 in para 4 of the writ petition relating to First Examination in Law. According to the Syllabus, at the time of petitioner's admission in Three Years Degree Course in Law, the Scheme of Examination provided that the Final Examination in Law in each subject shall carry 100 marks, out of which 90 marks will be given in written papers in each subject and 10 marks in each paper will be given for sessionals. The petitioner passed his First Examination in Law. He took admission in Second Year in Law in 1981. During the course of studies in the Second Year as a regular student, the petitioner submitted his sessionals and was awarded marks. The petitioner could not appear in Second Examination in Law on account of illness. The petitioner appeared in the Second Examination in Law in 1982 and was declared successful. In the marks -sheet (Ex 2) which was given to the petitioner, the marks obtained by him in 1981 in Second Examination in Law were not carried forward in each written paper. In cl. (b) of the Permission Letter of Examination, it was mentioned that the examination of the petitioner will be held in accordance with the Syllabus issued for the year 1981/82. Having come to know that policy of 10% marks for sessionals has been abolished, the petitioner submitted a representation dated April 3, 1983, the copy of which has been filed as Ex. 5.

(3.) THE learned Judge did not grant reliefs No. (i) and (ii). In regard to relief No. (iii), he observed as under while dimissing the writ petition summarily on October 5, 1982: