SHANKER Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision reveals the deplorable manner, in which the trial in a warrant case, was conducted by the judicial Magistrate and the jail appeal was disposed of has time in a mechanical and routine way by the learned Session Judge.

(2.) ACCUSED Sbanker was convicted under Sections 454 and 380/75, IPC and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 2,000/ - in default of payment of fine to further undergo one year's like imprisonment under the first court and three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5,000/ - in default of payment of fine to further undergo one year's like imprisonment under the second count by the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Begun vide his judgment dated November 22, 1982. He filed a Jail appeal challenging his conviction, but the same was dimissed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pratabgarh on January 17, 1983.

(3.) ON 22.11.1982, the learned Magistrate framed a charge against the accused for purpose of Section 75, I.P.C. in the folio wing manner: ;g fd vkius rkjh[k 2&11&82 dks lqcg 11 cts ds yxHkx pksjh dh vkSj muds }kjk vkius ,slk vijk/k fd;k tks Hkkjrh; n.M+ lafgrk dh /kkjk 454&380 Hkk n l - ds v/khu n.M+uh; gS vkSj vki 'kadj firk ojnkth Mkaxh ij ;g Hkh vkjksi gS fd vki mDr vijk/k djus ls iwoZ eq -u - 49@71 o 195@76 vUrZxr /kkjk 475] 380 Hkk n la es eqfUlQ ,oa U;kf;d eftLVsV fuEckgsM+k /kkjk Hkkjrh; n.M+ lafgrk ds v/;k; 17 ds v/khu rhu o'kZ dh vof/k ds fy, dkjkokl ds n.Muh; vijk/k ds fy, vFkkZr jkf= xqIr Hksnu ds ,oe~ pksjh ds vijk/k ds fy, nks'kf;r fd;s x;s tks nks'k fl) vc rd iw.kZr;k izLrqr vkSj izekf.kr vkSj vki Hkkjrh; n.M+ lafgrk dh /kkjk 75 ds v/khu ifjofrZRk n.M+ us n.M+uh; gS A vkSj es blds }kjk funsZ'k nsrk gwW Afdss vkids fo:) vufo{kk dh tkos A iz'u ua - 1%& - - - - iz'u ua - 2%& D;k vki vkjksi Lohdkj djrs gS ;k vufo{kk pkgrs gS A mRrj %& gkW eq