SOHANLAL SONI Vs. MANIRAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has filed an application for execution of an order of the Discipliction for execution of an order of the Disciplinary Committee No. 1 of the Bar Council of Rajasthan awarding Rs. 150/- as costs to the petitioner against the respondent. THE Office has raised an objection that the execution application is not maintainable and this is how the matter has been placed before me for orders.

(2.) THE respondent had made a complaint against the petitioner before the Bar Council of Rajasthan for taking disciplinary action against him on certain grounds with which we are not concerned at the moment. THE Bar Council of Rajasthan constituted a disciplinary committee consisting of Shri S. K. Jindal Advocate, Chairman, and Sarvashri S. N. Purohit and S. M. Singhvi, Advocates as members. After making an inquiry the Disciplinary Committee dismissed the complaint, but ordered the complainant (respondent) to pay Rs. 150/- as costs to the petitioner. THE petitioner applied for execution before the Disciplinary Committee and the latter transferred the appli-cation to the District Court, Jodhpur for execution. THE learned District Judge, however, dismissed that application saying that the petitioner realised that the application should have been filed before the High Court who alone could have transferred it for execution to the District Court.