(1.) THE learned counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection that the appeal is not maintainable. In support of his contention he drew our attention to the case law cited in RRD 1957 page 283 in which it has been held by the Board of Revenue that the appointment of a lambardar is a non-judicial matter and hence the order of appointing a lambardar is not appealable under sec. 76 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act.
(2.) THE learned counsel for the appellant however argued that Shri Kaluram had applied for the payment of his share from the lambardari amount deposited for the payment to the lambardars for their services. As such it is a question of rights and liabilities of a person. Hence it is an appealable order.