JAI SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an appeal under sec. 39 of the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act, 19|52 against the order of the Jagir Commissioner, Rajasthan dated 25. 10. 1962 determining the compensation amount of the appellant in respect of his jagir resumed by the State. We have heard the counsel for the parties and have also perused the record.

(2.) AT the outset, an objection was made by the learned counsel for the appellant that the learned Jagir Commissioner had dealt with the claims of Shri Hari Singh and Shri Jaisingh (two separate jagirdars) in one order under appeal, which he urged was illegal as each claim was to be determined separately. Simply because the Board of Revenue in its remand order had dealt with the case by a single order as the matters urged in two appeals were the same. , it. was not proper to have included the claims of both the jagirdars in that order. There is force in this contention as the compensation claim of each jagir is to be determined separately, the evidence will be different in each case, its appreciation will be naturally different in each case. These and the conclusion will also be different and it is, therefore, not a satisfactory procedure in such circumstances, to deal with more than one claim in one order.