AMARCHAND Vs. RAI SAHIB GOPICHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an appeal by the judgments-debtors against the District Judge, Jaipur District, dated 27th August, 1951.

(2.) A preliminary point was raised by the office that the appeal was barred by time. The appellants' contention is that their first application for grant of copy of the order of the lower court was wrongly consigned to records, and if the time requisite for grant of copies be calculated on the basis of the first application, the appeal will be within time. On a perusal of the record. I find that the first application for copy was correctly made, and if the time requisite is calculated from the first application, the made, and if the time The appeal is, therefore, held to be within time.