(1.) Since common question of facts and law are involved in both these writ petitions, therefore, these writ petitions are decided by this common order.
(2.) In SBCWP No.14741/2017 (Durga Bhati vs. State and Ors.), the following prayers were made:-
(3.) The brief facts giving rise to the present controversy are that the petitioners-Smt. Durga Bhati and Smt. Pramila Bhati, purchased Plot Nos.119 and 86 respectively in Khasra No.380 of Village Pal and after purchasing the same, registry was got done on 30/12/2016 after site inspection and registered sale-deed was granted in favour of the petitioners. Thereafter, in view of the audit objection of the authorities concerned, vide audit report dtd. 27/3/2017, the Inspector General (Stamps), initiated proceedings under Sec. 51 of the Rajasthan Stamps Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1988') against the petitioners and a notice Annexure-3 was issued to the petitioners to which, the petitioners filed reply on 12/6/2017. A copy of DLC rate (Annes.5) was supplied by the Collector (Stamps), Jodhpur Circle, Jodhpur. Thereafter, vide order dtd. 5/7/2017 (Annexure-6) while imposing penalty to the tune of Rs.39,140.00and 78,270/- respectively with penalty, surcharge and interest against the petitioners, impounded their documents. Being aggrieved thereof, the petitioners have preferred these writ petitions.