S Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The Juvenile Rs.S' son of Late Nacharam has been confined in connection with FIR No. 124/ 2023 registered at Police Stateion Loonkarnsar, District Bikaner and is facing charges under Ss. 457 and 380 of IPC. He is lodged at the Observation Home, Bikaner. The bail application preferred under Sec. 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 by the juvenile through aamicus curiae was dismissed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Bikaner vide order dtd. 19/6/2023. An appeal was preferred under Sec. 101 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 against the said order before the learned Judge, Children Court, Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005, Bikaner which also came to be dismissed vide order dtd. 16/9/2023 and the order passed by the learned Board was upheld. Aggrieved by the aforesaid two orders, the present revision petition has been filed under Sec. 102 of the Juvenile Justice Act read with Sec. 397/401 of the Cr.P.C.

(2.) Learned Counsel for the juvenile-petitioner submits that the Juvenile Justice Board as well as the learned Court below has grossly erred in rejecting the bail application of the juvenile-petitioner. They have failed to consider the correct factual and legal aspects of the case. The juvenile has been detained at the Observation Home, Bikaner since quite some time and looking at the pace at which the trial is proceedings, it will likely take long time to conclude. The Juvenile Justice Board has treated the accused as juvenile. He further submits that there is no possibility of the juvenile-petitioner absconding. There is nothing on record that may debar him from getting released on bail, therefore, it is humbly prayed that the impugned orders be set aside and the juvenile be released on bail.

(3.) Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the prayer made by learned Counsel for the juvenile petitioner and submits that since the matter pertains to commission of a grave offence, the petitioner is not deserving of being released on bail.