LAWS(RAJ)-2023-11-4

RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Decided On November 08, 2023
RAKESH KUMAR Appellant
V/S
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The instant appeal has been filed under Sec. 14A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.256/2023 dtd. 22/7/2023 registered at Police Station Jahajpur, District Bhilwara, for the offences under Ss. 363, 342, 366, 376(2)(N) of IPC and Sec. 3(1)(r)(s)(w), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

(2.) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has been falsely implicated in the case as the complainant went with the petitioner upon her sweet will. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that in the FIR lodged by the complainant, it has been stated that the petitioner forced her to sit with him on his motorcycle and also threatened her and thereafter took her to a hotel where he committed rape with her for five days continuously on the pretext that he would marry her. Learned counsel for the appellant also submits that the complainant in her statement recorded under Sec. 161 Cr.P.C., has stated that on 21/7/2023, the appellant received a call from his brother-in-law and told the complainant that his brother-in-law has come to know about the incident and his father was ill and the appellant could not marry her and he left her there and went away and thereupon, the complainant came back to her house and stated all the facts to her family members. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that in the statement given under Sec. 164 Cr.P.C., the complainant has narrated the same story that the petitioner upon the pretext that he would marry her took her to Jaipur forcefully in a bus and took her to a hotel where, he committed rape upon her. Thereafter, on 18/7/2023, he took her to another hotel and again for five days committed rape upon her and thereafter left her and the complainant came back to her house from Jaipur in a bus.

(3.) Per contra, learned learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application however, submits that the appellant has no previous criminal antecedents.